Eurograd message

Message posted on 20/07/2025

CfP for the 2nd conference on Undone Science in Computer Science

                Please consider submitting a proposal for the 2nd conference on *Undone
Science in Computer Science*  A conference to explore epistemological and
ethical dimensions of computer science through the concept of undone science.

  * *Luxembourg, 23-25th March 2026* (hybrid)
  * Calling for short talk proposals (1-3 pages abstracts)
  * Submission deadline: *October 9th 2025* (anywhere on Earth)
  * Post-proceedings model: we will send a call for full papers after
    the conference
  * Some travel funding available for speakers
  * More information at 

***

POTENTIAL TOPICS

It is not necessary to be familiar with the concept of undone science (Frickel
et al. 2009) in
order to contribute. *Potential topics include, but are not limited to:*

  * Areas of research in computer science meeting challenges that will
    require or have required *shifts in viewpoint*; conditions
    responsible for *certain kinds of research being over- or
    under-represented*; reasons for a set of *questions being
    neglected* in an area.

  * Epistemological questions and challenges, for instance arising
    from the *interdisciplinary nature* of computer science, or
    dealing with the articulations between theory and practice;
    investigations on the values of computer science.

  * How *social movements or civil society organisations* (e.g. free
    software movement) play a role in identifying areas of research
    being left aside, in providing new research questions, or on the
    contrary in demanding that some kind of research remains undone.

  * Challenges of integrating ethical and political questioning
    regarding *social, economic, and environmental consequences* of
    our work into the process of making good science. Concrete
    examples of questions stemming from ethical consideration being
    introduced to a domain (why/how), are welcome.

  * How *ethics codes* (including for instance the ACM Code of Ethics)
    can be leveraged (or fail) to present some questions as being
    worthy of exploration; more broadly how guiding principles can be
    put in place to enrich the research practices in an area.

  * Explorations of the *influence of publishing practices* within our
    community, and of popular research methodology and scientific
    writing guides provided within our fields, on the selection,
    execution, and dissemination of research.

  * Examinations of biases and limitations present in commonly-used
    *educational curricula* (for instance leading to or stemming from
    a lack of diversity, be it social or methodological).

  * More generally, any discussion of systematic non-production or
    non-dissemination of knowledge in a broad sense, whether in
    computer science in general or a specific area, whether past or
    present; whether due to *limitations of available methodologies,
    blind spots of dominant paradigms, institutional and industrial
    biases, lack of social representation,* or other factors.

We look forward to receiving your abstracts, and to an engaging and
thought-provoking conference.

Sincerely,
the organisers

- - - - - -
EASST's Eurograd mailing list -- eurograd-easst.net@lists.easst.net
Archive: https://lists.easst.net/hyperkitty/list/eurograd-easst.net@lists.easst.net/
Edit your delivery settings there using Account dropdown, Mailman settings.
Website: https://easst.net/easst_eurograd/
Meet us on Mastodon: https://assemblag.es/@easst
Or X: https://twitter.com/STSeasst
            
view formatted text

EASST-Eurograd RSS

mailing list
30 recent messages