Yet another session in Prague
Dear colleagues,
At the EASST/4S conference in Prague, we would like to discuss the
inclusion of researchers in their scientific communities. We think that
this concept has the potential to integrate a large body of studies that
are often unconnected. While aspects of fairness and justice are often
on the forefront of this research, we are particularly interested in
functional aspects, i.e. in negative consequences of for the production
of knowledge that arise from constraints on the inclusion of researchers
in their scientific communities. This led us to the following abstract:
Inclusion in scientific communities
The original conception of scientific communities by Robert Merton,
Thomas Kuhn and Michael Polanyi implied the idea that all members of
scientific communities equally participate in the production of
scientific knowledge. Meanwhile, science studies have uncovered many
constraints that limit the participation of researchers in the knowledge
production processes and decision processes of their scientific
communities. Examples include constraints based on gender, ethnicity,
access to means for research, or non-mainstream approaches in research.
At the international level, several scientific communities have begun a
discussion about a North-Western dominance in the selection of topics
and approaches. In addition to these constraints, which could be
considered endogenous to scientific communities, political decision
produce constraints by limiting access to resources, imposing secrecy,
or restricting travel and other forms of communication and collaboration.
The purpose of this open session is to explore the potential of studying
these phenomena from a perspective of researchers limited inclusion in
(or exclusion from) their scientific communities. We suggest considering
inclusion as the way in which researchers participate in knowledge
production and decision processes of their scientific communities, and
to look at mechanisms that constrain inclusion from a comparative
perspective. How are opportunities to participate in knowledge
production and decision-making distributed in international scientific
communities? Whose participation is restricted, and in which ways? What
mechanisms restrict inclusion? How does the inclusion of researchers,
national scientific communities, and world regions in the international
production of scientific knowledge change historically?
The usual conditions (deadlines etc.) apply - you read them many times.
Best wishes
Jochen Gläser and Nelius Boshoff (Stellenbosch University, South Africa)
--
PD Dr Jochen Gläser
Prof. Dr. Jochen Gläser
Social Studies of Science and Technology
Institute of Philosophy, History of Literature, Science, and Technology
TU Berlin, HBS 7
Hardenbergstr. 16-18
10623 Berlin
Germany
___
EASST's Eurograd mailing list
Eurograd (at) lists.easst.net
Unsubscribe or edit subscription options: http://lists.easst.net/listinfo.cgi/eurograd-easst.net
Meet us via https://twitter.com/STSeasst
Report abuses of this list to Eurograd-owner@lists.easst.net
EASST-Eurograd
30 recent messages
- 02/07/2025 Book Release: The Negotiation of Urgency: Economies of Attention in an Italian Emergency Room
- 01/07/2025 Postdoctoral researcher on Aquatic STS (University of Helsinki)
- 01/07/2025 Visiting research fellowships, Tema Technology and Social Change, Linköping University
- 01/07/2025 The Nuclear-Water Nexus: new edited volume with 25 contributors!
- 30/06/2025 TATuP 34/2 (2025) "Beyond short termism" & CfA "Exploring technologies through imaginary worlds"
- 27/06/2025 Full professor in Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna, deadline 17 September 2025
- 27/06/2025 CfA Funding for Research Sabbaticals (Fellowships) and Working Groups
- 25/06/2025 Reminder: June 27 Community Call: “Mapping Water Care Initiatives in the Americas”
- 25/06/2025 History of the Philosophy of Technology Resource
- 24/06/2025 AAA – Anthropologie & développemen=?utf-8?q?t =E2=80=93 Les formes contemporaines de l=E2=80=99argent=5FCont?= emporary forms of money.
- 23/06/2025 CfP: FOR 2026 - The Future of Open Research
- 20/06/2025 New book on global carcinogen regulation
- 19/06/2025 Realities of Autonomous Weapons / OA book from BUP / Hybrid book release with editors & L.Suchman
- 19/06/2025 Tenure Track positions open in Chile, deadline 07.07
- 19/06/2025 Advertising STS Winter School
- 17/06/2025 Instructions for authors for JAIS Special Issue on Contemporary Innovation in Information Infrastructures.
- 17/06/2025 Call for participation: Preparing Wishes for the Afterlife - Thinking with Death and Legacy in Artistic Practice
- 13/06/2025 Call for a special issue in Futures
- 13/06/2025 Postdoc Position in Sociology of Innovation & Digitalization (JKU Linz)
- 12/06/2025 CfP Workshop "AI x Crisis: Tracing New Directions Beyond Deployment and Use" | Aarhus Conference 2025 (Extended Deadline)
- 12/06/2025 Athena is offering 2 postdocs on mission-oriented innovation for food and health system transitions
- 11/06/2025 [mat-num] June 18 - Mia Bennett, “=?windows-1252?q?Polar frontiers=2C polar orbits=3A The spluttering launch ?= of Arctic commercial spaceports”
- 10/06/2025 CFP: Promises and Conflicts in the Infrastructuring of Agricultural Digitalization
- 10/06/2025 Talk: Aaron Perzanowski "The Law and Policy of Repair" (Maintenance & Philosophy SIG, Thursday June 12th 2025, 18-1915 UTC+1)
- 10/06/2025 FW: Symposium University of Liverpool 18 June 2025: How might be feel problems differently? (Re)thinking the case study methodology in STS
- 09/06/2025 Protocols for Knowing Microbes Otherwise =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93 Art and practice session at Nordic STS =28Stockholm=2C ?= 11-13 June)
- 09/06/2025 Fully funded 3 y Postdoctoral Researcher =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9CBuddhist Ethics for a Systemic Answer to the Attention E?= conomy”
- 06/06/2025 Call for Abstracts - ARS'25 (Naples, Italy) - Session on "Technoscientific networks”
- 06/06/2025 Free webinar on anti-microbial resistance June 10th
- 06/06/2025 Getting ready to do fieldwork? Field School in Ethnographic Research Methods