Eurograd message

                [with apologies for cross-posting]


Upcoming People, Plants and the Law lectures

Having trouble viewing this email? _View Online_




We are glad to advise you of the upcoming People, Plants and the Law online
lectures for 2024. Please note these dates in your calendar, invitations for
individual events will be sent closer to the event. If you have any questions,
please don't hesitate to contact Berris Charnley
.

We hope that you will be able to join us.




*Kelly Bannister (University of Victoria) *People-Plant Interrelationships and
the Law – but whose law? Expanding the conversation through Ethnobiology and
Biocultural Ethics**
“Variety is the spice of life” is a well known phrase that can be traced
back to a poem called *The Task *published in 1785 by William Cowper. Little
did Cowper know that he was onto something bigger than just pleasure! A couple
of centuries later, scientists tell us that variety – in the form of
biological diversity or ‘the variety of life on earth in all its forms and
interactions’ – is essential for the very continuance of humankind. We
also know from interdisciplinary fields such as ethnobiology that cultural
diversity and linguistic diversity (specifically Indigenous cultures and
languages) are inextricably linked with the world’s biological diversity –
and that all are facing imminent risk amid the complex social-and ecological
crises of our time.

Recognizing the vital role that diversity has in our future on earth
necessarily invites complexities into conversations about entanglements of
“people, plants and the law.” For example, how might the conversation
diversify by adding an “s” to “law” and to “people,” intentionally
considering Indigenous laws and laws of Nature alongside colonial law? And
what of the entanglements between law and ethics, given in some legal
traditions there is no distinction? The conversation might shift, in ways that
are messy, difficult, inconvenient – but perhaps also interesting and
productive?

This presentation offers a conversation-widening perspective on plants,
peoples and laws based in biocultural diversity research and ethics policy
development in Canada, drawing from recent spicy decades in ethnobiology and
related fields seeking to collaborate across Western and Indigenous systems of
knowledge, laws and ethics.

*Date:* Tuesday 8 October 2024
*Time:* 9am-10am AEST / 10am-11am AEDT / Time in your location

*Venue: *Zoom



Register here




*Rachel Wynberg (University of Cape Town) and Sarah Laird (University of Kent)
***Rethinking biodiversity-based economies for justice and conservation**

Rachel Wynberg is a Professor in the Department of Environmental and
Geographical Science at the University of Cape Town in South Africa where she
holds a government-funded Research Chair focused on Environmental and Social
Dimensions of the Bio-economy. With a background in both the natural and
social sciences, she has a strong interest in inter- and trans disciplinarity
and policy engagement across the humanities, arts and sciences. Her research
spans topics relating to just, ethical and biodiverse bio-economies; seeds,
farmers’ rights and agrobiodiversity; knowledge politics; agroecology and
food sovereignty; the governance of wild species; and emerging technologies
and equity in science.

Dr. Sarah A. Laird is a forester and ethnobiologist by training. Her interests
cover a range of inter-related issues, including forest-based traditional
knowledge and livelihoods, biodiversity policy, emerging technologies, and the
ethical and conservation dimensions of the commercial use of biodiversity.
Since the 1990s, Sarah has collaborated with communities around Mt Cameroon on
ethnobiological research and knowledge exchange programs to support and
conserve threatened traditional management practices and cultural forests. Her
current policy work includes that on the ethical and conservation implications
of transformative scientific and technological advances, particularly within
the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Rachel Wynberg and Sarah Laird presently co-direct a process of "rethinking"
the relationship between conservation and equity, and the biodiversity-based
economy, including access and benefit-sharing. https://rethinking-abs.org/


*Date:* Tuesday 12 November 2024
*Time:* 5:00pm-6:00pm AEST / 6:00pm-7:00pm AEDT / Time in your location

*Venue: *Zoom



Register here




*Uma Suthersanen (Queen Mary University of London) *WIPO Treaty on TKGR 2024:
Constructing Guidelines for Disclosure and ABS**

In May 2024, a new international treaty was adopted which introduced a new,
and hitherto controversial, norm namely the international obligation for
applicants to disclose the source or origin of genetic resources (GR) and/or
the associated traditional knowledge (TK) in patent applications (Article 3).
In its aims, this disclosure mechanism promotes: (i) “the efficacy,
transparency and quality of the patent system”, while not unduly burdening
patent offices, in addition to the requisite examination of novelty/inventive
step that all patent offices must conduct under the global norms (TRIPs
Agreement); (ii) preventing the grant of patents erroneously; and (iii)
national compliance of obligations under international and national access and
benefit sharing (ABS) regulations to ensure that users of TKGRs comply with
the requirements for access to GRs, including prior informed consent and
benefit sharing under mutually agreed terms.

However, the Treaty stresses that the sole fact of a failure to disclose will
not allow Contracting Parties to “revoke, invalidate, or render
enforceable” patent rights. (Article 5(3)). Post grant sanctions are allowed
in cases of “fraudulent intent”. This ambivalent attitude towards
sanctions permits contracting parties considerable flexibility in the
implementation of the disclosure mechanism.

My presentation will focus on this ambivalence, especially in light of the
following three questions. First, what is the trigger for the disclosure
mechanism to apply? Specifically, what does “based on” TKGR mean in
relation to a complex and multiple patent applications? Second, does the
disclosure mechanism include digital sequence information (DSI)? (Articles 8
and 9). Finally, what is the point of the international disclosure mechanism
without revocation or invalidity procedures/results? Specifically, how do we
interpret the opaque references to “fraudulent intent” in disclosure? In
looking at these questions, one should be cognisant of the readiness of
national patent systems to incorporate such disclosure mechanisms (including
the availability of accessible databases, monitoring, opposition proceedings,
etc), the coherence of disclosure/sanctions mechanisms within this treaty, as
well as the CBD/Nagoya protocol, the WIPO Patent Law Treaty (art. 10, PLT),
and the lessons learnt from other patent systems (e.g. US Bayh-Dohl’s
failure on disclosure requirements).

*Date:* Tuesday 10 December
*Time:* 6:00pm-7:00pm AEST / 7:00pm-8:00pm AEDT / Time in your location

*Venue: *Zoom



Register here


About the People, Plants and the Law Online Lecture Series


The People, Plants, and the Law online lecture series
 explores the legal and lively entanglements of human and
botanical worlds.

Today people engage with and relate to plants in diverse and sometimes
divergent ways. Seeds—and the plants that they produce—may be receptacles
of memory, sacred forms of sustenance, or sites of resistance in struggles
over food sovereignty. Simultaneously, they may be repositories of gene
sequences, Indigenous knowledge, bulk commodities, or key components of
economic development projects and food security programs.

This lecture series explores the special role of the law in shaping these
different engagements, whether in farmers’ fields, scientific laboratories,
international markets, or elsewhere.




This lecture series is a partnership between The University of Queensland, The
ARC Laureate Project Harnessing Intellectual Property to Build Food Security,
The ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant  Success in Nature & Agriculture, and
The ARC Uniquely Australian Foods Training Centre.

3699284.png



3471098.jpg



3699288.png



*www.plantsuccess.org/people-plants-and-the-law/*



The organisers of the People Plants and the Law lecture series acknowledge the
Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and their continuing
connection to lands, waters and communities. We pay our respect to Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders past, present and emerging.

You received this email because you have attended a People Plants and the Law
lecture in the past, or because a member of our research group listed you as
potentially interested in these lectures. To unsubscribe from this mailing
list, please use the link below.


This email was sent by Plant Success, ARC CoE for Plant Success in Nature and
Agriculture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia to
b.charnley@uq.edu.au


Unsubscribe



 



Researcher | CONSCICOM | University of Oxford | St Anne's College |
berrischarnley.com | ipbio.org | conscicom.org
_______________________________________________
EASST's Eurograd mailing list
Eurograd (at) lists.easst.net
Unsubscribe or edit subscription options: http://lists.easst.net/listinfo.cgi/eurograd-easst.net

Meet us via https://twitter.com/STSeasst

Report abuses of this list to Eurograd-owner@lists.easst.net