***apologies for unintended crossposting***
Dear all,
We are pleased to invite papers to our panel titled “Paradoxes and
puzzles of/in Citizen Science
” at the EASST
2022 Conference in Madrid 6-9 July 2022. The deadline is the 1st of
February. Your abstract proposal can be uploaded through the conference
link: https://easst2022.org/openpanel.asp
Looking forward to read your abstracts!
Bests
*Panel organizers*: Michiel Van Oudheusden (KU Leuven); Louise Elstow
(Lancaster University); Paolo Giardullo (University of Padova)
Citizen science (CS) can be broadly defined as a process in which
nonexperts engage in scientific research or data collection with or
without the support of science professionals (Irwin 1995; Bonney et al.
2009). Whereas the concept of CS in science is currently in vogue inside
and outside science and research (Kulleberg & Kasperowski 2016), it can
– and typically does – take on multiple forms, giving rise to tensions,
contradictions, paradoxes, and puzzles. For instance, credentialed
scientists may mobilize lay citizens to assist with scientific
observations and classifications. While this contributory approach to CS
is likely to yield valuable scientific data, it risks closing down
opportunities to develop a genuine public engagement culture in which
citizens and scientists co- create research problems, agendas, and
policies. Elsewhere, some scientists engage ‘in their free time’ in
their own research activities. To what extent might the output of these
activities be classed as ‘Citizen’ or ‘Professional’ science and what
impact does this have on what is produced?
The notion of CS itself is paradoxical as it embeds divergent notions of
science, citizenship, and democracy (e.g., invited versus self-organized
and more politically-laden citizen engagement), which stakeholders must
negotiate or ‘work out’ through exchanges between them. Examples pertain
to the language stakeholders use to make sense of mutual engagements
(Eitzel et al. 2017), the technologies and material arrangements (e.g.,
forms of infrastructure) that come into play (Gabrys 2021), the
boundaries that are drawn around what counts as CS (Ottinger 2010), and
the "data politics" (e.g., a commitment to open data) that shape these
data and which can have profound scientific and social implications
(Beraldo & Milan 2019).
Recognizing the essentially contested nature of the CS concept and its
manifold practices, this panel invites contributions that theorize or
empirically explore the different meanings of CS with a specific focus
on the tensions, riddles, and paradoxes found in CS theory and practice.
It invites panelists to consider these and related questions:
- What are the foundational tensions and paradoxes at the heart of CS?
- Where do we find these tensions and paradoxes?
- How are they sustained, resisted, transformed?
- How should we imagine these tensions and paradoxes?
- What do these paradoxes do – or not do?
- What are better ways of managing or navigating them – and why?
- How will these tensions and paradoxes play out in the future?
- How can rethinking CS contribute to different and perhaps healthier
relations between those doing science?
- Can we expect – and should we anticipate – new paradoxes emerging
in/from CS in the short and distant future?
Such questions help to open up consideration about the politics of CS
and the role of citizens in technoscientific futures, as CS continues to
gain traction in the worlds of policy, research, and innovation; and
publics continue to engage with science and technology in manifold ways.
*Key words*: Citizen Science; Paradox; Politics
--
Paolo Giardullo, PhD
Post Doc Researcher
Department of Philosophy, Sociology,
Education & Applied Psychology (FISPPA)
Section of Sociology
Pa.S.T.I.S. Research Unit
University of Padua
via M. Cesarotti, 10/12
35123 PADOVA - ITALY
view formatted text
