Dear all,
<br>
<br>With less than one month for the submission deadline´s, I would like to
<br>remind you the opportunity to submit a contribution for this exciting panel
<br>(number 91) that we are organizing at the next 4S/EASST conference at
<br>Prague: *“Institutionalization and social appropriation of RRI”.*
<br>*(Deadline
<br>28th of February)*
<br>
<br>https://www.easst4s2020prague.org/accepted-open-panels-all-abstracts/
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>*91. Institutionalization and social appropriation of RRI: A remaining
<br>challenge?*
<br>
<br>*Raúl Tabarés, Fundación TECNALIA RESEARCH & INNOVATION; Vincent Blok,
<br>Wageningen University & Research; Mika Nieminen, VTT Technical Research
<br>Centre of Finland; Robert Braun, Institut für Höhere Studien Vienna*
<br>
<br>*Since 2013, the EC has pushed a devoted strategy to foster the embracement
<br>of RRI across the whole Horizon 2020 FP. This effort has allowed to develop
<br>a generous body of knowledge, experiences and networks around the concept
<br>with the determination to promote a significant change in European R&D.
<br>However, with the conclusion of FP8 and the beginning of FP9 at the
<br>forefront, it´s time to reflect about how RRI has effectively permeated
<br>different institutions across the EU and outside of it. On the one hand,
<br>New HoRRIzon project has shown that the institutionalization of RRI in
<br>research organizations is still a challenge. On the other hand, other
<br>projects (e.g. RRI practice, RIconfigure) have indicated ways forward to
<br>mainstream RRI. That duality demands to explore what are the remaining
<br>challenges towards its full implementation.*
<br>
<br>*In this panel we would like to explore how RRI has been diffused all over
<br>the last 7 years in Europe with the help of questions such as: Which
<br>challenges face RRI throughout the EU territory ? What characteristics
<br>have shaped RRI diffusion? What drivers can lead the RRI paradigm towards
<br>its institutionalization? Which best practices can be shared and
<br>transferred across the continent? *
<br>
<br>*We welcome submissions from different fields of academia (political
<br>science, philosophy, sociology, social psychology, anthropology and STS of
<br>course) that want to share their findings about this timely policy
<br>episode. We also welcome papers from different stakeholders engaged in this
<br>topic such as research funders, policy makers, science communicators and
<br>citizen associations.*
<br>
<br>*Contact: **FARAONDEMETAL@GMAIL.COM *
<br>
<br>*Keywords:** open science, stakeholder engagement, ethics, STI policy,
<br>innovation ecosystems*
<br>
<br>*Categories: **Governance and Public Policy*
<br>
<br>*Science Communication/Public Engagement*
<br>
<br>*Knowledge, Theory and Method*
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Looking forward to your contributions and hope to see you all at Prague!
<br>
<br>😉
<br>
<br>--
<br>
<br>------------------------------
<br>Best,
<br>Raúl
<br>
<br>@faraondemetal
<br>http://es.linkedin.com/in/rtabares
<br>
<br>[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/png which had a name of Captura1.PNG]
<br>_______________________________________________
<br>EASST's Eurograd mailing list
<br>Eurograd (at) lists.easst.net
<br>Unsubscribe or edit subscription options: http://lists.easst.net/listinfo.cgi/eurograd-easst.net
<br>
<br>Meet us via https://twitter.com/STSeasst
<br>
<br>Report abuses of this list to Eurograd-owner@lists.easst.net
view formatted text
